Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 051
Original file (2013 051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-051

 

Partial relief: Amend Sep Authority to 12.B.16, SPD code to JND, and
Narrative Reason to: Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons

 

 

 

TIS | 4 yrs, 4 months, 9 days
Policy Implications _ | None

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to an established pattern showing a failure to pay debts. The
applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record and Separation Package were available for the Board to review.

The Board utilized available information contained in electronic records and documents submitted by the
applicant.

The applicant first received a letter of caution from the USCG Security Center (SECCEN) in late 2004 on the
status of their security clearance. This notice was due to the excessive amount of debt owed to a laundry list of
creditors. SECCEN followed up in late 2006 to indicate that no improvement had been made to eliminate the
sizable debt that the applicant had created over a significant amount of time. In early 2008, SECCEN forwarded
their intent to revoke the security clearance as 8 more creditors surfaced totaling over 13 thousand dollars. Over
those past three years, the applicant was given an opportunity to improve their financial well-being and respond
with any information showing an effort to consolidate and eliminate said debt. In the Spring of 2008, the
security clearance was officially revoked and the applicant did not appeal the decision.

As a result of losing the clearance, the applicant could no longer perform the duties as a Petty Officer in their
rate. At this time, an Unsatisfactory conduct evaluation and formal financial counseling was received from the
command. The applicant was not punished adversely at anytime from the initial SECCEN notice to the 4 years
thereafter. The applicant was given an extended period of time to reduce the overall debt, however the debt
increased in the 42 months after the first notification. The applicant’s direct chain of command (in Spring 2008)
worked directly with applicant on a financial spending/accounting plan in which dishonest actions on numerous
cash withdrawals were discovered. A four part written update was provided to the command on the
unwillingness to properly account for nearly $900 dollars spent in cash. This was after agreements to show
payment receipts for all of the basic month-to-month necessities were not met. Additionally, the command
formally counseled applicant on the need to change their rating for retention in the service. The member refused
that option at that time which is illustrated in emails between the command and epm-1.

The applicant was notified of the intent to discharge, and the applicant was advised of the rights to an attorney.
A statement was made while objected to discharge.

Despite the pattern of indebtedness, the Board finds that the applicant’s Narrative Reason for Separation of

Misconduct is not equitable with separations stemming from financial irresponsibility. The legacy Personnel

Manual COMDTINST M1000.6A, Art 12.B.16.b(6) separated enlisted personnel for Unsuitability for a
patterned failure to pay debts.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was NOT equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Partial relief is granted as follows:

 

| 24. Discharge: No change
| 25. Authority: _COMDTINST M1000.6A, Art 12.B.16

 

 

 

 

26. Separation Code: JND
27. Re-entry Code: No change

28. Narrative Reason: Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 024

    Original file (2014 024.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon notification of the command’s intent to discharge the applicant, the applicant made a statement and objected to discharge. Despite the pattern of indebtedness, the Board finds that the applicant’s Narrative Reason for Separation of Misconduct is not properly aligned with separations stemming from financial irresponsibility. Discharge: No change 25.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 048

    Original file (2013 048.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-048 Honorable, COMDTINST M100.6A, ART 12-B-12, JPD, Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, RE4 Upgrade RE code, Change Narrative Reason for Separation Partial relief: Recommend Narrative Reason is amended to: Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure due to receiving two alcohol incidents in 2008- 2009. Therefore, the Board recommends the following...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 016

    Original file (2014 016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CORRECTIONS TIS 3 yrs, 3 months, 6 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Unsuitability due to Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure in the summer of 2006. On the equity standard, the board referred to ALCOAST 125/10, to make a recommendation on the Narrative Reason (NR) for his separation. The Board notes most or all separations occurring after said ALCOAST to present, only issue a JPD (SPD) code when the member is unable to complete outpatient...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 007

    Original file (2013 007.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-007 Honorable, M1000.6A, 12.B.16, JND, Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons, RE3 Upgrade RE code None None TIS 6 yrs, 3 months, 16 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for separation for miscellaneous/general reasons due to alcohol abuse. The Board also utilized available information contained in electronic records and documents submitted by the applicant. The applicant was then taken to NJP in...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 050

    Original file (2013 050.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-050 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, Article 12.B.16, JFX, Personality Disorder, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Upgrade RE code RELIEF GRANTED SPD code: JND Narrative Reason: Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons BY DRB RE code: RE-3H Separation Authority: COMDTINST M1000.4, Article 1.B.12 (legacy Personnel Manual 12.B.12) ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 7 yrs, 6 months, 12 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 061

    Original file (2013 061.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the absence of any firm documentation to support a fraudulent enlistment, or the applicant’s formal request for separation from the service, the Majority Board vote has recommended an alternate means to categorize the Narrative Reason for Separation. With regard to the Majority Vote to recommend a partial upgrade on the reentry code: An RE3 reentry code is not an affirmative recommendation for reenlistment, rather it represents that the applicant is not recommended for reenlistment due...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 055

    Original file (2013 055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following provides an outline of the approval process and the notable findings: Applicant’s command: Made separation notification after just 3 months on performance probation. The current application requests to remove the Narrative Reason (NR) as ‘Unacceptable Conduct’, and to amend it to a Voluntary Separation that is in alignment with SPD code KND with an NR of Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons. EPM separation approval (summary): In the summer of 2013, the Discharge was...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 056

    Original file (2013 056.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-056 CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, ART 12.B.18, JKA, Pattern of Misconduct, RE4 BY DRB to JHJ, RE code to RE-3Y, Narrative Reason to Unsatisfactory Performance CORRECTIONS TIS 1 yr, 6 months, 16 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to receiving two Non-Judicial punishments within a 2 year period. In 2010, the command initiated Discharge proceedings which made...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 038

    Original file (2014 038.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    With regard to the Narrative Reason for Separation, the applicant had previously been to outpatient treatment in 2009 for a self-referral. On the equity standard, the board referred to ALCOAST 125/10 to make a recommendation on the Narrative Reason (NR) for his separation. Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Partial relief is granted based on post-policy issued in ALCOAST 125/10: Separation Authority: COMDTINST M1000.4, ART 1.B.15 SPD code: JND Narrative Reason...

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 086

    Original file (2012 086.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2012-086 NAME Ee 3 CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.6, 12.B.18, JKD, Misconduct, RE4 E RELIEF REQUESTED | Upgrade Re code; Upgrade to Honorable Honorable; SPD code: JND. However, pursuant to Article 4.B.1 of the Reserve Policy Manual, COMDTINST M1001.28A, commands are required to “monitor member participation” and “Correct performance deficiencies by timely counseling of members who are not participating satisfactorily. The...